Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Julio Martinez v. Knauf Gips KG, et al
as 23-10108
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIO MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KNAUF GIPS KG and KNAUF PLASTERBOARD ( TIANJIN ) CO., LTD.
Appleby et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 0:2022cv61411
Plaintiff:
Veronica Appleby, Priscilla Brown, Julian Brown and others
Defendant:
Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard (Tianjin) Co LTD and Knauf New Building System (Tianjin) Co. Ltd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martinez v. Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG
as 1:2021cv24181
Plaintiff:
Julio Martinez
Defendant:
Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG, Knauf Gips KG, Knauf Plasterboard ( Tianjin ) Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Knauf GIPS, KG
as 1:2021cv24196
Plaintiff:
Karina Martinez
Defendant:
Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG, Knauf GIPS, KG, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft KG et al
as 1:2021cv23542
Plaintiff:
Laura Veira, Dan Blonsky, Ruben Dapena and others
Defendant:
Gebrueder Knauf Verwaltungsgesellschaft, KG, Knauf International GmbH, Knauf Insulation GMBH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Appleby et al v. Knauf Gips KG et al
as 0:2021cv60948
Plaintiff:
Andrew K Wagner, Farouk Mohammed, Dueane Warren and others
Defendant:
Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., LTD. and Knauf Gips KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
North Light Speciality Insurance Company v. Martinez
as 4:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
North Light Speciality Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jesus Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24346
Plaintiff:
Yessica Martinez and Eric Anthony Rosson
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc. , Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
