Cases 41 - 46 of 46
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc v. Unimed Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00956
Petitioner:
Besins Healthcare, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corp., McKesson Corp. and others
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Par Pharmaceuticals Inc, Paddock Laboratories Inc and others
Respondent:
Burlington Drug co., Miami-Luken, Inc., Value Drug Company and others
Counter Defendant:
Rochester Drug Co-Operative Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hernandez v. Espinosa et al
as 1:2008cv22768
Plaintiff:
Alfred Hernandez
Defendant:
Jorge T. Espinosa, Peter W. Fudali, Kimberly L. King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center, Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center and Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center
Defendant:
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. and Hospital Authority of Albany / Dougherty County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lebrun v. Carnival Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv20623
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Lebrun and Michael D. Lebrun
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation, Regent Seven Seas Cruises, Regent Seven Seas Cruises and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
D's Pet Supplies, Inc. v. Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00517
Plaintiff:
D's Pet Supplies, Inc.
Defendant:
Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc., Arkansas Best Corp., ABF Freight Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Harrel, et al v. Veneman, et al
as 2:2003cv00115
Plaintiff:
Welpha Harrel, Jr., James Alexander, Annie Arnold and others
Defendant:
Anne Veneman, John D. Ashcroft and David P. York
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
