Cases 211 - 220 of 18,207
Windsor v. Pepperman et al
as 5:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
William Michael Windsor
Defendant:
Judge Carla R. Pepperman, Emily Curington, Gary Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Urizar et al
as 6:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jejuan Sims
Defendant:
Gaby Aparicio Urizar and EXP Realty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A Fresh Start Mennonite et al BPOA v. Volusia County Agents et al
as 6:2024cv00822
Plaintiff:
A Fresh Start Mennonite et al BPOA
Defendant:
Volusia County Agents and Volusia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marshall v. BK7 Restaurants LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80566
Plaintiff:
Danette Marshall
Defendant:
BK7 Restaurants LLC and Seven Restaurant, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
RIVAZ v. MCNEIL et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
JARREL DANIEL RIVAZ
Defendant:
RAYMOND MCNEIL, JOSEPH HUTCHISON and KRISTIAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cleveland v. Prendergast et al
as 5:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Alginavon Teriano Cleveland
Defendant:
Michael Prendergast, David Miller, Evan Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koch v. Genesis Reference Laboratories, LLC
as 6:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Kersey Koch
Defendant:
Genesis Reference Laboratories, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wheeler v. DolgenCorp, LLC
as 5:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WHEELER
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP LLC a foreign limited liability company and DolgenCorp, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McCoy v. Jung
as 8:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Quinton McCoy
Defendant:
William Frederic Jung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gomez v. Kaur et al
as 8:2024cv01016
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Gomez
Defendant:
Sudeep Kaur, NYS Child Support Processing Center and Silbana Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
