Cases 41 - 50 of 106
WALKER v. CITY OF GAINESVILLE et al
as 1:2019cv00190
Defendant:
JOSEPH REGISTER, MEGAN BOSTICK, KELLY GADET and others
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WALKER v. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
DR KEVIN VINCENT, HOWARD REGAN and UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
DERRICK L WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker v. Tenth Judicial Circuit Court et al
as 8:2019cv02370
Defendant:
Tenth Judicial Circuit Court, State of Florida, Latorea Spohr and others
Plaintiff:
Romerio La'Tee Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Walmart Inc.
as 8:2019cv02239
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shanta Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
SHINN v. CLEMMONS et al
as 3:2019cv03381
Defendant:
RACHEL C CARTLER, NATHANIEL R MORGAN, P RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
LAVON R SHINN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Maria D's Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01017
Defendant:
Maria D's Inc. and Virgil L. Adkins, Sr.
Plaintiff:
Reginald Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Watts v. Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois et al
as 8:2019cv00829
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, Michael F. Otto, Daniel J. Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Wayne Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JERMC LTD. et al v. Town of Redington Shores et al
as 8:2019cv00688
Defendant:
Town of Redington Shores, Joseph Walker, Tom Kapper and others
Plaintiff:
Nashaat Antonious, JERMC LTD., Soheir Antonious and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gardner et al v. Mutz et al
as 8:2018cv02843
Plaintiff:
Randy Whittaker, Wade Steven Gardner, Ken Daniel and others
Defendant:
Don Selvage, William Mutz, Andy G. Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Walker v. Lalchandani et al
as 3:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Walker
Defendant:
Ajit Lalchandani and Ann Coffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
