Cases 121 - 130 of 56,417
Charles, Jones v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80655
Plaintiff:
Paul Charles
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Peters
as 6:2024cv00943
Petitioner:
Richard Barrett Dale Walker
Respondent:
Warden, RRM Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mason Turner v. Sheriff of Monroe County, Florida
as 24-11662
Petitioner:
MASON C. TURNER
Respondent:
SHERIFF OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
EVANS v. ARCH
as 2:2024cv14158
Plaintiff:
ROGER VON EVANS
Defendant:
CAREN L ARCH, BROWN, RICKY DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aragones v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00260
Petitioner:
Nelson Aragones
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
IBRIHIM v. LANGLEY
as 1:2024cv00081
Petitioner:
SIRAJ IBRIHIM
Respondent:
J LANGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fred Bryant v. Limestone CF Warden, et al
as 24-11629
Petitioner:
FRED LEE BRYANT
Respondent:
LIMESTONE CF WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and ELMORE CF WARDEN
Hernandez-Mena, Nelson v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80654
Plaintiff:
Nelson Hernandez-Mena
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarra v. Cobb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2024cv02235
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Cobb County Sheriff and Craig Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diarra v. Georgia Department of Correction, Comm.
as 1:2024cv02234
Petitioner:
Moussa Diarra
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Correction, Comm.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
