Cases 21 - 30 of 40
Murphy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2014cv01542
Petitioner:
Gregory Earl Murphy, Sr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Solomon v. State of Florida, et al
as 12-16532
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIE D. SOLOMON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, O. EDGAR WILLIAMS, JR. and JOHN J. MURPHY, III
Murphy v. Tucker
as 8:2012cv02434
Petitioner:
Elton Brutus Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MURPHY v. TUCKER
as 5:2012cv00349
Petitioner:
ELTON BRUTUS MURPHY
Respondent:
KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Florida Attorney General
as 5:2012cv00124
Petitioner:
Jace R. Murphy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOLOMON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 0:2011cv61889
Petitioner:
WILLIE D SOLOMON
Respondent:
State of Florida , O EDGAR WILLIAMS, JR and JOHN J MURPHY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SOLOMON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 5:2011cv00243
Petitioner:
WILLIE D SOLOMON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, O EDGAR WILLIAMS, JR and JOHN J MURPHY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 3:2010cv00069
Petitioner:
Jose Ernesto Perez Morales
Respondent:
Corrections Corp. of America, McRae Correctional Facility, Walt Wells and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodney Murphy v. Secretary, DOC, et al
as 10-12130
Petitioner - Appellant:
RODNEY L. MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Earlie Murphy v. Anthony Washington
as 10-11361
Petitioner - Appellant:
EARLIE MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
