Cases 31 - 40 of 395
Lusk v. Taylor
as 1:2022cv02574
Petitioner:
Justice Robert Lusk
Respondent:
Keybo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lofton v. Unknown
as 4:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Robert Lofton
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lusk v. Barber et al
as 1:2022cv02315
Petitioner:
Justice Robert Lusk
Respondent:
Police Officer Barber, Police Officer Alberto Calderon, Police Officer Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Smith
as 1:2022cv02217
Petitioner:
Robert L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden, Dooly State Prison and Amie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Smith
as 1:2022cv01149
Petitioner:
Robert Wright
Respondent:
Aimee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00240
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDaniel v. Carr
as 4:2021cv00356
Petitioner:
Robert Steven McDaniel
Respondent:
Christopher Carr
Not Classified By Court:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. State of Georgia
as 3:2021cv00111
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Griffin
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HART v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00120
Defendant:
WARDEN STEADLEY
Respondent:
PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT EDWARDS, LT INGRAM, DEPUTY WARDEN PEOPLES and others
Petitioner:
JONATHAN ANDREW HART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GUYTON v. ADAMS
as 3:2021cv00039
Respondent:
Warden Robert Adams
Petitioner:
JONATHAN GUYTON
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
