Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Milton v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv62613
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Milton
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv23607
Plaintiff:
Milton Hall
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Florida Attorney General and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ahmad Milton v. State of Florida
as 15-13335
Petitioner - Appellant:
AHMAD MILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Ahmad Milton v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-13221
Petitioner - Appellant:
AHMAD MILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
PHILLIPS v. HENRY
as 3:2015cv00255
Petitioner:
JOHN MILTON PHILLIPS, JR
Respondent:
MARK HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv21783
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Milton
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Flordia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Milton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv60931
Plaintiff:
Cory Milton
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hale v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 2:2015cv00210
Petitioner:
Nathon Alan Hale
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Milton Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Whitman et al
as 1:2015cv00706
Petitioner:
Milton Daniels
Respondent:
David L. Whitman, Mary Wise, Butch Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Porter et al
as 1:2015cv00707
Petitioner:
Milton Daniels
Respondent:
Danny Porter, Butch Conway, Lindsey Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
