General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
RIDLEY v. SELLERS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00157
Petitioner: EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY
Respondent: ANDY SELLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sellers
as 3:2007cv00038
Petitioner: James Antwon Woods
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Sellers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00199
Petitioner: Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ridley v. Haralson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00072
Petitioner: Edward Tyrone Ridley
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sellers
as 3:2007cv00022
Petitioner: James Antwon Woods
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Sellers
as 5:2007cv00145
Petitioner: James Antwon Woods
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Sellers
as 3:2007cv00019
Petitioner: John O'Neal
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Sellers
as 5:2007cv00138
Petitioner: John O'Neal
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neal v. Sellers
as 5:2007cv00126
Petitioner: John O'Neal
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Sellers
as 5:2007cv00115
Petitioner: Kenneth M. Lewis
Respondent: Andy Sellers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?