Cases 1 - 10 of 395
Dunlap v. McFarlene
as 1:2024cv02835
Petitioner:
Jr. Robert Dunlap
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. McFarlene
as 4:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Robert Dunlap
Respondent:
Andrew McFarlene
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Matthew C. Mastrom
Defendant:
Jr. Robert Adams
Respondent:
Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner:
KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent:
U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner:
Terrance Dent
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01298
Petitioner:
Herman Ingram
Respondent:
Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Mimms
as 1:2024cv01026
Petitioner:
Robert R. Johnson
Respondent:
Charles M. Mimms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ADAMS
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent:
ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
USA and Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollowell v. McBath et al
as 1:2023cv05782
Petitioner:
Jo'Von Montell Hollowell
Respondent:
Elizabeth McBath, Boulee Jean-Paul, John K. Larkins, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
