General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 262
Raits v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01677
Respondent: florida department of corrections
Petitioner: Adam J Raits
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mastrom v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00155
Respondent: Tyrone Oliver and Jr. Robert Adams
Petitioner: Matthew C. Mastrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dent v. Adams
as 1:2024cv02453
Petitioner: Terrance Dent
Respondent: Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Respondent: PENSACOLA FPC
Petitioner: ADAM P RUNSDORF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner: Adam Hale
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01298
Petitioner: Herman Ingram
Respondent: Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ADAMS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent: ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams Dorval v. Warden
as 24-10510
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner: THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?