General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 259
RUNSDORF v. PENSACOLA FPC
as 3:2024cv00242
Petitioner: ADAM P RUNSDORF
Respondent: PENSACOLA FPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00533
Petitioner: Adam Hale
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner: Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent: Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingram v. Adams
as 1:2024cv01298
Petitioner: Herman Ingram
Respondent: Robert Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. ADAMS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner: MARCUS LAMAR BROWN
Respondent: ROBERT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams Dorval v. Warden
as 24-10510
Hightower v. Adams, Jr.
as 1:2023cv05563
Petitioner: Richard Hightower
Respondent: Robert Adams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITTLE v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner: THOMAS ANDREW WHITTLE
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, STATE OF GEORGIA and KELLI ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duane Adams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13455
Petitioner / Appellant: DUANE E. ADAMS
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Adams III v. Taylor
as 1:2023cv04127
Petitioner: William Jerome Adams, III
Respondent: Sheriff Kebo Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?