Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bragg v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Lee County)
as 2:2024cv00540
Petitioner:
Christopher Bragg
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bragg v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Christopher Bragg
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00182
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. BRAGG et al
as 4:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
Warden TRAVIS BRAGG, CHARLES LEMON, DAVID ANDREW COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Bragg et al
as 4:2020cv00308
Petitioner:
Seneca Roberts
Respondent:
Warden M. Travis Bragg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BRAGG v. JONES
as 3:2015cv00318
Petitioner:
JEFF MCGEE BRAGG
Respondent:
JULIE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bragg v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv20485
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bragg
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SPIVEY v. BRAGGS
as 5:2014cv00191
Petitioner:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Respondent:
M TRAVIS BRAGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Braggs v. Tucker et al
as 1:2012cv20407
Plaintiff:
Xavier Uron Braggs
Defendant:
Ken Tucker and Attorney General State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv03151
Petitioner:
Brandon Jackson
Respondent:
Antonio Harris, James E. Donald, Ralph Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
