Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Curry v. Warden Carlton
as 8:2024cv00528
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Curry v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-13486
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Curry v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk County)
as 8:2023cv01470
Petitioner:
Runnell Deshay Curry
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Hasty et al
as 7:2022cv00733
Petitioner:
Donell Curry
Respondent:
Denise Hasty and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Oliphant v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oliphant v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Avakian v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Petitioner:
Nerses Hratch Avakian
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yatsenko v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00051
Petitioner:
Anton V. Yatsenko
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
