General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,521
Jones v. Dixon
as 3:2024cv00259
Petitioner: Derick Levell Jones
Respondent: Secretary, FDC Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLORENCE v. HYLES et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Petitioner: KIM CAMILLE FLORENCE
Respondent: U.S. MAGISTRATE STEPHEN HYLES, Judge CLAY D LAND, Judge BOBBY PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grebenor v. Dixon
as 2:2024cv00515
Petitioner: Kyle Joseph Grebenor
Respondent: Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KNIGHT v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00241
Petitioner: ARNOLD JEROME KNIGHT
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Goodson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11602
Petitioner: MICHAEL D. GOODSON
Respondent: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
BROOKINS v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00223
Petitioner: ELIJAH JABBER BROOKINS
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALLEN v. OLIVER
as 7:2024cv00046
Petitioner: MONALETA D ALLEN
Respondent: TYRONE OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCUMSEY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 3:2024cv00203
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER D MCCUMSEY
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner: Demari D. Lee
Respondent: Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelly v. Dixon (Volusia)
as 6:2024cv00830
Petitioner: Ricky Raynard Kelly
Respondent: Ricky D. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?