Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Dustin v. Warden, Clay County Jail
as 3:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Warden, Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danny Dustin v. Director of Clay County Jail
as 24-10429
Petitioner:
DANNY RICHARD DUSTIN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF CLAY COUNTY JAIL
Dustin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Clay)
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Danny Hammond v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10025
Petitioner:
DANNY HAMMOND
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dustin v. Warden, Green Cove Springs Jail
as 3:2023cv01464
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Warden, Green Cove Springs Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin v. Bucci
as 3:2023cv01251
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Joseph Bucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin v. Bucci
as 3:2023cv01059
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Joseph Bucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Administrator White et al
as 6:2023cv00955
Petitioner:
Danny Thompson
Respondent:
Administrator White and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dustin v. State of Florida
as 3:2023cv00629
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dustin v. State of Florida
as 3:2023cv00391
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
