Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Raymond Gill v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Medium
as 23-13117
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND EDWARD GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - MEDIUM
SIKES v. PISTRO et al
as 5:2023cv00070
Petitioner:
EDWARD GILL SIKES
Respondent:
PISTRO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SIKES v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
EDWARD GILL SIKES
Respondent:
KEVIN D PISTRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv04351
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith and Mrs. Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maslow v. Warden et al
as 4:2022cv00242
Petitioner:
Thomas Maslow
Respondent:
Warden, Honorable Mrs. Suzanne Smith, Mrs. Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sikes v. Warden, FCI Marianna
as 1:2022cv22880
Plaintiff:
Edward Gill Sikes
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Marianna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marvin Gill v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12743
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARVIN C. GILL
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Jean-Gilles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv00674
Petitioner:
Excellent Jean-Gilles
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gill v. United States of America
as 6:2021cv00622
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gill v. Warden, FCC Coleman
as 5:2021cv00174
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
