Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Adan v. Doe
as 1:2024cv02432
Petitioner:
Saleeban Isse Adan
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ADAN v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
SALEEBAN ISSE ADAN
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carruth v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01294
Petitioner:
Terrence Carruth
Respondent:
John or Jane Doe and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. REED et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Petitioner:
JAI DEVON LEE
Respondent:
AMANDA REED, DONALD CONEWAY, SR and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILLIARD EL-BEY v. LYNN et al
as 7:2023cv00015
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL LEE HILLIARD EL-BEY
Respondent:
Captain STEPHEN D LYNN, RONALD L DAVIS and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CHANDLER v. STRAUDER et al
as 3:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
JAKALE E CHANDLER
Defendant:
OFFICER STRAUDER, OFFICER WOODS, OFFICER POWEL and others
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN Q WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Steven Benton Aubrey v. Broward County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 0:2022cv61504
Plaintiff:
Steven Benton Aubrey
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Ronald Dion DeSantis, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
CONNELL v. DOE et al
as 4:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
LARRY GENE CONNELL
Respondent:
JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MALONE v. BRAWNER
as 1:2019cv04237
Petitioner:
MARLO A MALONE
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and Ronald Brawner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MALONE v. DOES
as 5:2019cv00342
Petitioner:
MARLO A MALONE
Respondent:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
