Cases 1 - 10 of 341
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2024cv00298
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Devasko Lewis v. Warden
as 24-11502
Petitioner:
DEVASKO DEWAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN, Georgia Diagnostic & Classification Prison
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Lewis
Respondent:
Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEWIS v. GILLIS
as 1:2024cv00006
Petitioner:
CHANEY K LEWIS
Respondent:
SHAWN GILLIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Gillis
as 4:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
Chaney K. Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Shawn Gillis
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Ben Hill County
as 1:2023cv04867
Petitioner:
Chaney Lewis
Respondent:
Ben Hill County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2023cv00589
Petitioner:
Robert Lewis Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BELL v. DIXON
as 3:2023cv24425
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEWIS BELL, SR
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILLS v. PISTRO
as 5:2023cv00242
Petitioner:
JESSICA HILLS
Respondent:
PISTRO, WINGFIELD, BOOZEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
