General Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
White v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv03887
Petitioner: DENISE WHITE
Respondent: State of Georgia, Fulton County Magistrate Court and WARREN ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WHITE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner: DENISE WHITE
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA, FULTON COUNTY MAGISTRATE COURT and WARREN ATKINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JONES v. COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00176
Respondent: COFFEE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT and COFFEE COUNTY MAGISTRATE COURT
Petitioner: SAMUEL E JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Irizarry v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2018cv04961
Defendant: Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, Rockdale County, Rockdale County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff: Omar Irizarry
Respondent: Judy Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Donavan et al
as 4:2017cv00136
Petitioner: Craig A. Jordan
Respondent: Donald R. Donavan, Magistrate Court and Paulding County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2017cv01660
Petitioner: Craig A. Jordan
Respondent: D. Victor Reynolds and Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lowery v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2016cv01415
Petitioner: Abdulhakim Salaam Lowery
Respondent: Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Cobb County Superior Court, Cobb County Magistrate Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pritchett v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Dept. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv02947
Petitioner: Gary Pritchett
Respondent: Gwinnett County Sheriff's Dept. and Gwinnett County Magistrate Court
Intervenor: Gary Vaughn; Family Pritchett Unincorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?