Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ray v. State of Florida (Lee)
as 2:2024cv00525
Petitioner:
Clifton Michael Ray
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ray v. Warden, Lee County Jail
as 2:2023cv00940
Petitioner:
Clifton Michael Ray
Respondent:
State of Florida, Cape Coral Police Department, Fort Myers Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchem v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00449
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Mitchem
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Miller v. Darden
as 2:2018cv00242
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Miller
Respondent:
Jermaine White Darden and Warden Jermaine White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Coffey v. Warden
as 16-14952
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY COFFEY, a.k.a. Randall Sanders
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN
Coffey v. Hall
as 1:2016cv00054
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Coffey
Respondent:
Phil Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Lovan v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 15-14903
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY LOVAN
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Barnes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2015cv01938
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Barnes
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lovan v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00132
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Lovan
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLINES v. MCNEIL
as 3:2008cv00208
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAY CLINES
Respondent:
WALTER A MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
