Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mason Turner v. Sheriff of Monroe County, Florida
as 24-11662
Petitioner:
MASON C. TURNER
Respondent:
SHERIFF OF MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Turner, Mason v. Monroe County Sheriff
as 4:2024cv10035
Plaintiff:
Mason C. Turner
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez Cuevas v. Monroe County Sheriff Department
as 4:2023cv10088
Plaintiff:
Silvio Omar Hernandez Cuevas
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
David Lola v. State of Florida, et al
as 22-13026
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID JAMES LOLA
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and MONROE COUNTY SHERIFF
Stubbs v. Monroe County Sheriff
as 4:2022cv10028
Plaintiff:
Tavoris Terrell Stubbs and Tavaris T. Stubbs
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BROWN v. MONROE COUNTY GEORGIA
as 5:2021cv00026
Respondent:
MONROE COUNTY GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ALLEN JOSHUA BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mayfield v. Circuit Court 16th Judicial Circuit, Monroe County, Florida
as 4:2020cv10022
Defendant:
Circuit Court 16th Judicial Circuit, Monroe County, Florida
Plaintiff:
Darren Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lola v. State of Florida et al
as 4:2020cv10011
Defendant:
State of Florida and Monroe County
Plaintiff:
David James Lola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 4:2019cv10207
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS, Director of the ICE Field Office, Warden of Monroe County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Kohan Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matus v. Monroe County Detention Center
as 4:2013cv10168
Plaintiff:
Alonso Matus
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
