Cases 101 - 110 of 219
Hewlett v. Shaffer et al
as 6:2014cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael A Hewlett
Defendant:
Scotty R Shaffer, Robert Danford, Kim Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Hutton et al
as 7:2014cv01347
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bernard Scott
Defendant:
John Hutton, ALDOC Cert Team and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01350
Plaintiff:
Alfonte Bailey
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Corizon Medical Services and Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 7:2014cv01312
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Johnson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2014cv01202
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee White
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Thomas et al
as 2:2014cv01174
Plaintiff:
Roy Burns
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Alabama Department of Corrections
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.J. v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01127
Plaintiff:
M. J.
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Roberts
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv01118
Plaintiff:
Hercules Thomas
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Kim Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections and Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Estes et al
as 5:2014cv01106
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant:
Dewayne Estes, Jimmy Patrick, Dothey Goode and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
