Cases 131 - 139 of 139
Marbury v. Burkhalter et al
as 4:2007cv00236
Plaintiff:
Melvin Mark Marbury
Defendant:
Tim Burkhalter, Tom Caldwell and Tony Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Reid et al
as 1:2007cv22907
Plaintiff:
Vincent F. Rivera
Defendant:
Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Alcee L. Hastings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Mahoney et al
as 9:2007cv80914
Plaintiff:
Jwan Singleton
Defendant:
Tom Mahoney and Grey Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. Elmore et al
as 4:2007cv00141
Plaintiff:
George A. Dempsey
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, Tom Edenfield, Javier Portales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis et al v. United States of America et al
as 8:2007cv01226
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lewis, Annie Lewis and Henry Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Drug Enforcement Administration, Tom Feeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miggins et al v. Fulton County Georgia et al
as 1:2007cv00773
Plaintiff:
Larry Miggins and Vincent Johnson
Defendant:
Fulton County Georgia, Fulton County Board of Commissioners, Karen Handel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Chapman et al
as 5:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tasha Monique Lee Jones
Defendant:
Tom Chapman, Georgia Department of Corrections and Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Smith, et al
as 1:2003cv03354
Plaintiff:
Jimmy F. Harris
Defendant:
J. D. Smith, Tom Morgan, Virginia A. Tinklee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Lewis v. USA, et al
as 8:1995cv00580
Plaintiff:
Anthony John Lewis
Defendant:
Tom Feeney and Dale Vandorple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
