Cases 11 - 20 of 232
Walker v. Helton et al
as 5:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Taug N Walker
Defendant:
Jason Helton, Scott Jenson and Russell Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Valles et al
as 0:2023cv61362
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Byrd
Defendant:
Daniel B. Valles, Leonard E. Diaz, Ronald Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
VARGAS v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
JUAN MONTES VARGAS
Defendant:
DR HARRIS and Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Russell et al
as 3:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jonte Dominique Harris
Defendant:
Michael J. Russell, Craig Williams, D.W. Molina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Alpert et al
as 4:2023cv10004
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Parker
Defendant:
Kellie Danielle Alpert, Marcus Del Valle, Alexi Butirsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Tashee M. James
Defendant:
Officer Johnson, Officer B. Cunningham, Sergeant Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POSEY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 3:2022cv20432
Plaintiff:
DAVID RUSSELL POSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Will et al
as 6:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Russell
Defendant:
Pastor Will, C. Ramsey, Richard Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CAMPBELL v. CORECIVIC INC et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
HARRINGTON CAMPBELL
Defendant:
CORECIVIC INC, Warden RUSSELL WASHBURN, NANCY SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v Morgan and Morgan
as 6:2022cv01579
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Russell
Defendant:
Morgan & Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
