Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Jones v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2019cv03114
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Jones
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ible v. Warren et al
as 1:2017cv05480
Plaintiff:
Dion T. Ible
Defendant:
Neil Warren and Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Floyd County Adult Detention Center
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Labron Harper
Defendant:
Floyd County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Jordan
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Lops and Carriker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Gwinnett County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02438
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Edward Cochran
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Adult Detention Center, US Prisoner Transport, Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Cobb County Government et al
as 1:2017cv01408
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Gates, Sr.
Defendant:
Cobb County Government and Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyejo v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sunday Sunny Boyejo
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Eubank, Bradfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Cobb County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv04812
Plaintiff:
Torrey D. Coleman
Defendant:
Cobb County Sheriff's Department, Cobb County, Thomas Griner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Oasis Management System et al
as 1:2016cv04620
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Vickers
Defendant:
Oasis Management System, State of Georgia, Central State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Unnamed Defendant
as 1:2015cv04202
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Williams
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant and Cobb Co. Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
