Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 53
HAMPTON v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2023cv00109
Petitioner: PAUL CHANDLER HAMPTON
Respondent: STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Alpert et al
as 4:2023cv10004
Plaintiff: Robert R. Parker
Defendant: Kellie Danielle Alpert, Marcus Del Valle, Alexi Butirsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Strauder et al
as 1:2022cv05161
Plaintiff: Jakale E. Chandler
Defendant: Strauder, Commander: Mr. Woods, Powel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
as 3:2022cv00114
Plaintiff: JAKALE ERRION CHANDLER
Defendant: UNKNOWN DEFENDANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff: Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant: Converse, Crutchfield, Kebo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADDY v. MERRITT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00144
Plaintiff: RONALD JERMAINE GRADDY
Defendant: PEYTON MERRITT, CHANDLER BUCHANAN and DERRELL GILBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chandler v. Commissioner Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2020cv03009
Plaintiff: Dale Eugene Chandler
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monroe v. Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
as 3:2020cv01219
Defendant: Jacksonville Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff: Chandler Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. Edwards et al
as 5:2020cv00202
Defendant: FNU Franson, FNU Edwards, FNU Warningly and others
Plaintiff: Christopher L Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Warningly et al
as 5:2020cv00165
Plaintiff: Christopher L Edwards
Defendant: FNU Edwards, FNU Warningly, FNU Franson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?