Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Randolph v. City of Baldwin, Georgia et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant: John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff: Joshua Brian Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maskevich v. Ivey et al
as 6:2017cv01626
Plaintiff: Joseph E. Maskevich
Defendant: Wayne Ivey, Thomas Walter, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Harris et al
as 1:2014cv24620
Plaintiff: James Rich
Defendant: Jeremy A. Harris, Colonel Colon, John Doe (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dausch, Jr. v. Corizon Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01322
Plaintiff: Carl E. Dausch, Jr.
Defendant: Corizon Corporation, Olugbenga Ogunsanwo, Isabel Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dausch, Jr. v. Corizon Corporation et al
as 6:2014cv01727
Plaintiff: Carl E. Dausch, Jr.
Defendant: Corizon Corporation, Olugbenga Ogunsanwo, Isabel Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyer v. Ulmen, et al
as 8:2014cv00469
Plaintiff: Joshua Keith Boyer
Defendant: Richard Ulmen, John Doe #1, John Doe # 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiderlen v. O'Brien et al
as 5:2013cv00326
Plaintiff: Steven Kiderlen
Defendant: Terry O'Brien, Uknown Castro, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kiderlen v. O'Brien et al
as 6:2013cv01006
Plaintiff: Steven Kiderlen
Defendant: Terry O'Brien, Uknown Castro, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hope v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2012cv61056
Plaintiff: Linc Hope
Defendant: John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tomblin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Plaintiff: Charles Franklin Tomblin
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Corrections, Warden Hicks, Corrections Officer Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?