Cases 41 - 50 of 98
IRVIN v. CALDWELL et al
as 5:2019cv00004
Defendant:
JANE DOE, EDGINALD GIBBONS, LAKISHA FRANKLIN and others
Plaintiff:
FREDDIE LEWIS IRVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORMILYN v. MORRIS et al
as 5:2018cv00370
Defendant:
MITZI HALL DON, DEANN MORRIS and DEPUTY WARDEN FRANKLIN
Plaintiff:
JAMES ELIAS CORMILYN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Taylor et al
as 3:2018cv00060
Defendant:
Lt. Franklin, Lt. Shannette Taylor, Officer Wilcher and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. SISK et al
as 3:2018cv00114
Defendant:
SGT TAMMY, CAPTAIN SISK, LT CLAY and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Taylor et al
as 6:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Alfred Lee Jacobs
Defendant:
Officer Welcher, Lt. Shannette Taylor, Lt. Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMS v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2018cv00084
Defendant:
JANE DOES, JOHN DOE, THOMAS and others
Plaintiff:
CHAUNCEY SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargreaves v. Franklin et al
as 4:2018cv00129
Plaintiff:
Chad Hargreaves
Defendant:
Herbert Buzz Franklin, Leonard C. Gregor, Jr., Stephanie Palmer Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hargreaves v. House et al
as 4:2017cv00227
Plaintiff:
Chad Hargreaves
Defendant:
Brian House, Leonard C. Gregor, Jr. and Herbert E. (Buzz) Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yerdon v. Union County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Joseph Andrew Yerdon
Defendant:
Union County Jail, Anita Franklin, Susan Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
