Cases 41 - 50 of 631
HORRY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
DARREL HORRY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF GEORGIA and WARDEN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Twitty v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Andre J Twitty
Defendant:
United States of America, Shannon D. Withers, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Corey L. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. M. Antonelli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dorval v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01254
Plaintiff:
Adams Dorval
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Georgia and Warden Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Moore v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
Columbus J Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Green v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Clarence Green
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
DICKEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH R DICKEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Steven D'Amico v. USA, et al
as 23-10580
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN F. D'AMICO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT N. SCOLA, FEDERICO A. MORENO and others
Jeriton Curry v. USA
as 23-10535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERITON LAVAR CURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
