Cases 51 - 60 of 457
CRUTCHLEY v. ADDISON et al
as 7:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
CAPTAIN ADDISON, SERGEANT CLARK and SHERIFF RAY PAULK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, FACILITIES DIRECTOR JACK KOON, JOHNNY SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, AHMAD HOLT, CLAY NIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, GREGORY DOZIER, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUTCHLEY v. PAULK et al
as 7:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Defendant:
Warden ASHLEY PAULK, Officer JACKSON and Officer NESMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Long et al
as 1:2022cv03492
Plaintiff:
Liam Alexander
Defendant:
Ann Long, Gregory Adams, Laura Alford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. NEAL et al
as 3:2022cv16791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
NEAL, C NEELY, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANEY v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JEROME CHANEY, JR
Defendant:
JHONATHON L ADAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Boston et al
as 1:2022cv02988
Plaintiff:
Deonta David
Defendant:
Sherry Boston, Joshua M. Geller, Helen Pott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
