Cases 61 - 70 of 37,240
Thevenin v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2024cv80682
Plaintiff:
Loveus Thevenin
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
ROOKS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J ROOKS
Defendant:
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, TOMMY J SMITH, ALISON BURLESON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv02333
Plaintiff:
James E. Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TABB v. WASHINGTON
as 5:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY TABB
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLAYTON v. KELMON et al
as 5:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
CAPTAIN KELMON, WARDEN MACFALEN, TIMOTHY C WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. DAVIS
as 5:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
WILLIE DANTE SMITH
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Le Clerc, Sr. v. John Guy, et al
as 24-11047
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ALLEN LE CLERC, SR.
Defendant:
JOHN I. GUY and MARK R. MILLER
McCray v. The Sheriff of Palm Beach County, Florida et al
as 9:2024cv80676
Plaintiff:
Willie McCray
Defendant:
The Sheriff of Palm Beach County, Florida and Officers on Duty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Varnadore et al
as 2:2024cv14167
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lewis
Defendant:
Detective Richard Varnadore, Detective Christopher Tullio, Detective Leland Schoonmaker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
