Cases 1 - 10 of 23
JACKSON v. WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
DEWAYNE CORNELL JACKSON
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MONROE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAPTAIN PECORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edson Gelin v. Emmett Boggs, Jr., et al
as 23-10565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDSON GELIN
Defendant / Appellee:
EMMETT JACKSON BOGGS, JR. and MICHAEL A. DRAKE
Gelin v. Boggs et al
as 6:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Edson Gelin
Defendant:
Emmett Jackson Boggs, Jr. and Michael A. Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Verdun v. Smith et al
as 8:2021cv02370
Plaintiff:
Bruce Alan Verdun, Sr.
Defendant:
Michael P. Smith, Brian Morland, Rebecca Angel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Carr et al
as 1:2021cv02799
Plaintiff:
Zekemian Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Carr, Andy Pascuals, Daniel M. Coursey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norington v. Zoley et al
as 9:2019cv80302
Defendant:
George C. Zoley, Assistant Warden S. Fitch, Sergeant David Young and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and Shawntrell Norington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOUIE v. Altman et al
as 7:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE TERRELL BOUIE
Defendant:
HARRY JAY ALTMAN, II, THOMASVILLE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and MICHAEL P BOGGS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witchard v. Mosley et al
as 6:2014cv02042
Plaintiff:
Joseph Witchard
Defendant:
Lakesia R. Mosley, Jeff Seeger, Jeffrey Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs v. Ellis et al
as 4:2014cv00202
Defendant:
J Ellis, A Hammock, Crickmar and others
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs et al v. Willingham et al
as 4:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Defendant:
Willingham, Crickmar, Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
