Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Gates v. Cherri et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
Sargeant Cherri, Sargeant Ceazar, Sargeant L. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz, Manuel v. Connor et al
as 4:2024cv10006
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ruiz
Defendant:
Curry Connor and Gustavo Correa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gutierrez Perez v. Monroe County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2023cv10110
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gutierrez Perez
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Office, Alexander Fierro and Connor Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIE v. MCKINNEY et al
as 5:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEVON CURRIE
Defendant:
MCKINNEY and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Curry v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
O'Neill v. Griffis et al
as 3:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
Cash Aaron O'Neill
Defendant:
Garret Jason Griffis, Christopher Walker, Mike Hauge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. USP Coleman et al
as 5:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Defendant:
USP Coleman, Medical and FNU Antonelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuce v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Fuce, Sr.
Defendant:
Lenny Curry, Sheriff Mike Willams, Armor Correctional Health Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
