Cases 1 - 10 of 29
CLAYTON v. WARD
as 5:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, GEORGE IVEY, STG EDWARD FLOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. DeKalb County et al
as 1:2022cv04925
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Matthews, Jr.
Defendant:
DeKalb County, Sheriff Melody Maddox, Governor Brian Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLAHAN v. BOBBITT et al
as 3:2021cv00068
Defendant:
ERIC EBERHARDT, WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT, JUDGE STEVE JONES and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caines v. Akies et al
as 1:2021cv01790
Plaintiff:
Kevin Emanuel Caines
Defendant:
Lieutenant Dicks, Lieutenant Lester, DeKalb County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. HOLLAND et al
as 5:2021cv00139
Defendant:
SERGEANT A ELLIS, UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN, SMU UNIT MANAGER ROLAND and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MATTHEWS et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, WARDEN FORD, UNIT MANAGER RUFUS LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALLARD v. MORALES et al
as 5:2021cv00138
Defendant:
WARDEN JOSE MORALES, DEPUTY WARDEN TOMMY COFFEE, LT CLUBPER and others
Plaintiff:
RICO LAMAR BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Dekalb County Detention Officer et al
as 1:2021cv01231
Plaintiff:
Relonzo Phillips
Defendant:
Adediran, Olarinde, Gwendolyn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Hunter et al
as 1:2020cv05074
Defendant:
Linda W. Hunter and DeKalb County Police Department
Plaintiff:
Jacob Zion Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. PAULK et al
as 7:2020cv00101
Plaintiff:
LOGAN CLARK
Defendant:
Sheriff ASHLEY PAULK and Captain THOMAS CLIFTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
