Cases 1 - 10 of 36
McCain v. White et al
as 5:2019cv00949
Plaintiff:
Tarquinne Tre'Von McCain
Defendant:
John Hutton, Willie Thomas, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Thomas et al
as 7:2017cv02104
Plaintiff:
Darrius Mack
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Hutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony v. Thomas et al
as 7:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Vertis Jerome Anthony
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and John Hutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Rutledge v. State of Alabama, et al
as 16-16083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY M. RUTLEDGE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, KIM THOMAS, in his former individual and official capacities as Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, in his current official capacity as Commissioner for the Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Crawford v. Hutton et al
as 7:2016cv01469
Plaintiff:
Thomas Crawford
Defendant:
John Hutton, Sgt. Hines, David Pavlokovic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Bennett et al
as 7:2016cv01423
Plaintiff:
Seron Smith
Defendant:
William Bennett, John Hutton, Debra Toney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01366
Plaintiff:
Elrick Marcus Taylor
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Thomas et al
as 7:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Corey Lemar Cannon
Defendant:
Willie Thomas, Debra Toney, Willie Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Nelson et al
as 7:2016cv01342
Plaintiff:
Samuel T Johnson
Defendant:
A Nelson, John Hutton and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stackhouse v. Dr Pavlokovic et al
as 7:2016cv01315
Plaintiff:
James Stackhouse
Defendant:
Dr Pavlokovic , John Hutton and Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
