Cases 1 - 10 of 178
WATSON v. DOE et al
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
TYRONE WATSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WATSON v. WHITEFIELD
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
TYSON N WATSON
Defendant:
HEATHER WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Doe et al
as 5:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron Watson
Defendant:
John Doe, S. Jones, A. Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Watson III v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
Marshall Watson III
Defendant:
State of Florida, f.c.c.c., GEO Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumrall v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv05395
Plaintiff:
Ammon Ra Sumrall
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Timothy Ward, Alan Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ulbrich v. Speed et al
as 2:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Eric Jason Ulbrich
Defendant:
Sheriff Carlton Speed, Capt. Evans, Capt. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROCKETT v. WESLEY et al
as 5:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
CORY BROCKETT
Defendant:
OFFICER WESLEY, CHAPLAIN NORMAN WATSON and NATHAN CORENLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyree Ford v. Carmine Marceno, et al
as 23-12604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREE FORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMINE MARCENO, SMART COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC., VINCENT AMOROSO and others
Watson v. Quinones et al
as 6:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jermetras Deangelo Watson
Defendant:
Chief Louis A. Quinones, Jr., Judge Tarlika Nunez-Navarro, Officer of Orange Co Dalton Hammer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Pierre Watson
Defendant:
United States of America, John/Jane Doe, FNU Salem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
