Cases 131 - 140 of 326
Daniels v. Palmer et al
as 3:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
Roy O. Daniels
Defendant:
John Palmer, Walker Clemmons, S. M. Cherry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howes v. Sgt. Moore et al
as 3:2017cv00131
Plaintiff:
Erlin James Howes
Defendant:
Sgt. Moore, Jane Doe, Arnode and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sussman v. Metcalf et al
as 8:2017cv00186
Petitioner:
David C. Sussman
Respondent:
C. Metcalf and CUMBIE
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosa v. City of Naples, Florida et al
as 2:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Julio N. Rosa
Defendant:
City of Naples, Florida, Collier County Sheriff Office, Kevin Rambosk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Martin
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Fails v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-17588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. FAILS
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, INSPECTOR GENERAL, WARDEN and others
FAILS v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2016cv00766
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J FAILS
Defendant:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robles v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 8:2016cv03068
Plaintiff:
Pedro Escudero Robles
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Timothy Sheffield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Frazier v. Secretary, Department of Corre, et al
as 16-16643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KELVIN FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, FRAN WOOD, R. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer and others
Powers v. Corizon Health Care et al
as 3:2016cv01067
Plaintiff:
Bobby D. Powers
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care, Drake, Dicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
