Cases 11 - 20 of 137
Mobley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2022cv22165
Plaintiff:
Raqwan Mobley
Defendant:
M. Kelly, Ruben Williams, Stephen Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Kallman v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 5:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Tracy Kallman
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, A Canan, D. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KALLMAN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
TRACY KALLMAN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, A CANAN and D KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Kelly et al
as 6:2022cv00942
Plaintiff:
Raqwan Mobley
Defendant:
M. Kelly, Ruben Williams, Stephen Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. ROBBINS et al
as 3:2022cv04903
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
ALESHIA ROBBINS, SHEILA MELVIN, K M KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. CENTERIA MEDICAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
TARRUS HAKEEM KELLY
Defendant:
CENTERIA MEDICAL SERVICE, R MCALPIN and MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2022cv00630
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KELLY HARRISON, II
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, EDMOND and MCDANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEEPLES v. ALLEN et al
as 3:2021cv04646
Plaintiff:
EARL PHILLIP PEEPLES
Defendant:
ALLEN, BROWN, COLONEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FERNANDEZ v. WILLIS et al
as 3:2021cv04482
Plaintiff:
LAZARO R FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JOHN WILLIS, JOHN DOUG SLOAN, NORMA KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOULTRIE v. KELLY et al
as 3:2021cv04036
Defendant:
CHARLES LEE MOULTRIE, JR, PATRICIA D KELLY and JOHN A FOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
