Cases 21 - 30 of 1,675
Peter Gatlyn v. Sergeant Moore, et al
as 24-11651
Plaintiff:
PETER A. GATLYN
Defendant:
SERGEANT MOORE and JOHN DOE
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
DENZEL EVANS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bless, Alfredo v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2024cv80636
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Bless and Alfredo -a- Bless
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office, The Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. NICOLAS et al
as 3:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
KEION NATHANIEL CHAMBERS
Defendant:
C NICOLAS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheffield v. Doe et al
as 8:2024cv01150
Plaintiff:
Lance Javon Sheffield
Defendant:
John Doe, John or Jane Doe, Sgt. Brittney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLESKE v. CHILDS et al
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE WALLESKE
Defendant:
LARRY CHILDS, RONTERRIOUS WILLIAMS, JOHN DOES 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norfleet v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Tino A. Norfleet
Defendant:
Charlotte County Sheriff's Office, Officer Tucker, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walleske v. Childs et al
as 8:2024cv01044
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Walleske
Defendant:
Larry Childs, Ronterrious Williams, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merritt v. Mathewson et al
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Larry Bernard Merritt
Defendant:
John Doe Mathewson, John Doe Morales, John Doe Scarpatti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
