Cases 1 - 10 of 15,423
Gatlyn, Peter v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv22444
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Gatlyn
Defendant:
John Doe, Senior Chaplin Stasney, J. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson, Darren v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv22439
Plaintiff:
Darren C. Anderson and Mujarhid Ma
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolf v. Mclain et al
as 2:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
DJulino Exulus Woolf
Defendant:
Patrick Mclain, Reginal Counsel Office, Lee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURNSIDE v. ARAMARK CORPORATION et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
DARRELL DARRON BURNSIDE
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, ADAM SUTTON and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldsboro v. Trettis et al
as 3:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Harry Lee Goldsboro, II
Defendant:
Robert Blaise Trettis, Phil Archer, Terrence O'Suilivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOLOMON v. BRAHAM et al
as 5:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARNELL SOLOMON
Defendant:
BRAHAM and J FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS and ANGELA LILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. POWERS et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
POWERS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHANDLER v. RALPH et al
as 3:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
CALVIN ANTHONY CHANDLER
Defendant:
A RALPH and C CASWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DELICES v. TUCKER
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
VILES DELICES
Defendant:
PRESTON TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
