Cases 1 - 10 of 31
FDOC PRISONERS/WE THE PEOPLE et al v. FDOC SECRETARY et al
as 4:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
FDOC PRISONERS/WE THE PEOPLE and George William Hankins
Defendant:
FDOC SECRETARY and FLORIDA GOVERNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kash v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Frank Charles Kash
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, George Gintoli, Emily Salema and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debolt v. Linder et al
as 2:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
George Debolt
Defendant:
Linder, Cardenas, Fenech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Debolt et al v. Olivera et al
as 2:2019cv00380
Defendant:
Donald Sawyer, FNU Jenkins, FNU Payne and others
Plaintiff:
George Debolt and Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poole v. Masony et al
as 2:2017cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Poole, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian Lee Masony, William Price, Donald Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00194
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Carrol et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Charles Junior Barber
Defendant:
Mike Carrol, Shan Jumper, Marta Prado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Gregory O'Neil Henderson
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abaunza v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00812
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Abaunza
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Correct Care Recovery Solutions, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gering v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
Robert Gering
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc., Mike Carroll, George Zoley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
