Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. 9545 Stoney Ridge Lane, Alpharetta, GA 30022
as 4:2020cv00291
Defendant:
9545 Stoney Ridge Lane, Alpharetta, GA 30022
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 3140 Mulberry Greens Lane, Jefferson, Georgia 30549
as 1:2017cv02477
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3140 Mulberry Greens Lane, Jefferson, Georgia 30549
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 3140 Mulberry Greens Lane, Jefferson, Georgia 30549
as 2:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3140 Mulberry Greens Lane, Jefferson, Georgia 30549
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. The Real Properties located
as 1:2014cv00600
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Real Properties Located at 3354 Memorial Drive, Decatur, Georgia and 1561 Parkcrest Lane, Grayson, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. 1777 Old Camp Trail, NW Conyers, GA et al
as 1:2011cv01534
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
1777 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, GA, 1766 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia, 1700 Old Camp Trail, NW, Conyers, Georgia and others
Claimant:
Larry Simmons and All-Star Properties & Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Funds, $165,511.87 in US et al
as 7:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Funds, $165,511.87 in US, Funds, $244,965.84 in US, Funds, $289,200.66 in US and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1324 Aliens: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 3823 Roxberry Hill Lane, Buford, Gwinnett County, Georgia
as 1:2008cv03793
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
3823 Roxberry Hill Lane, Buford, Gwinnett County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
