Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Pritchett et al v. United Parcel Services Inc
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cain Pritchett, Micheal Arnold, Bradley Barkley and others
Defendant:
United Parcel Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sims v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01757
Plaintiff:
George Sims
Defendant:
WASTE PRO USA, INC. and WASTE PRO OF GEORGIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Howard et al v. Waste Pro USA, Inc et al
as 6:2020cv01339
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF LOUISIANA INC., WASTE PRO USA, INC, WASTE PRO OF ALABAMA INC. and others
Plaintiff:
BERNIE HOWARD, JORDAN FINN, ROLLEN STERLING and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ikeme et al v. Waste Pro USA, Inc. et al
as 6:2020cv01304
Plaintiff:
SHARWIN CARTER, ELIJIAH REID IV,, DEMARIO SIMS and others
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF SOUTH CAROLINA, WASTE PRO OF NORTH CAROLINA and WASTE PRO USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Buice v. Trim-Co Exteriors, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00064
Defendant:
Scott E. Sims and Trim-Co Exteriors, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Buice
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Sims v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgia, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03031
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Georgia, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brittany Phillips Sims
v. Parmanand et al
as 0:2019cv61043
Defendant:
Michael Sims, Lallos 441 LLC and Parbattie Parmanand
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Parmanand v. Lallos 441, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv61045
Defendant:
Michael Sims and Lallos 441, LLC
Plaintiff:
Parbattie Parmanand
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Etienne v. Lallos441, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv60498
Defendant:
Michael Sims and Lallos441, LLC
Plaintiff:
Raymond Etienne
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Sims v. T&K Towing & Roadside Services, LLC et al
as 0:2017cv61927
Plaintiff:
James Earl Sims
Defendant:
T&K Towing & Roadside Services, LLC and Tarik Kose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
