Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc., v. de Moraes
as 9:2020mc82159
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch Business Financial Services Inc.,
Defendant:
Jose Carlos de Moraes
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv02626
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc. , C. Robert Henrikson , William J. Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smolchek et al v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.
as 9:2012cv80356
Plaintiff:
Tamara Smolchek and Meri Ramazio
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Pink et al
as 2:2011cv00564
Plaintiff:
Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Pink, Matthew J. Jallits, Rachel J. Jallits and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Goldsborough et al
as 1:2011mc03562
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James E. Goldsborough
Garnishee:
Merrill Lynch, PeoplesSouth Bank and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. Ritter et al
as 2:2009cv01275
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
C Dowd Ritter, Jackson W. Moore, Irene Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated v. Murphy
as 9:2009cv80553
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Defendant:
James Murphy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Merrill Lynch,Pierce,Fenner & Smith,Inc. v. Chanda
as 9:2007cv80648
Plaintiff:
Merrill Lynch,Pierce,Fenner & Smith,Inc.
Defendant:
John Chanda
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
