Arbitration Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 141 - 150 of 788
Lloyd v. Frederick et al
as 1:2022cv22191
Petitioner: Seested Lloyd
Respondent: Schultz Frederick, Eric Teichberg and Howard Rothman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. et al v. Silverman et al
as 1:2021cv23044
Petitioner: American Enterprise Investment Services, Inc. and Ameriprise Financial Services, LLC
Respondent: Miriam Silverman and Miriam Silverman Living Trust
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Hobbs v. Serra Chevrolet Inc
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff: Samuel Hobbs
Defendant: Serra Chevrolet Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
McGowin v. The Terminix International Company., LP et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff: Courtney McGowin
Defendant: The Terminix International Company, LP and Terminix International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Bluequest Resources, AG v. Venalloys LLC
as 1:2022cv22045
Plaintiff: Bluequest Resources, AG
Defendant: Venalloys LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Beverley Schottenstein v. Evan Schottenstein, et al
as 22-11835
Plaintiff / Appellee: BEVERLEY B. SCHOTTENSTEIN
Defendant / Appellant: EVAN A. SCHOTTENSTEIN and AVI E. SCHOTTENSTEIN
Davis v. Amalgamated Transit Union
as 1:2022cv02770
Plaintiff: Gregory M. Davis
Defendant: Amalgamated Transit Union
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 4 Petition to order arbitration; failure to arbitrate
Seested, III v. Schultz et al
as 1:2022cv22192
Plaintiff: Lloyd Victor Seested, III
Defendant: Frederick Joseph Schultz, Eric Jordan Teichberg and Howard Stuart Rothman
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney,LLC, et al v. Shefer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv21542
Plaintiff: Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Financing LLC
Defendant: Izhar Shefer
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award
Umwelt- und Ingenieurtechnik GmbH v. Prolific Mining Corp.
as 1:2022cv21808
Petitioner: Umwelt- und Ingenieurtechnik GmbH
Respondent: Prolific Mining Corp.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Motion to confirm arbitration award

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?