Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hoops Corporation et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff: Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant: Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11684
Plaintiff / Appellant: OKEELANTA CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
United States Sugar Corporation, et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al
as 23-11683
Plaintiff / Appellant: UNITED STATES SUGAR CORPORATION, OKEELANTA CORPORATION and SUGAR CANE GROWERS COOPERATIVE OF FLORIDA
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (CIVIL WORKS) and others
Wilson v. Fluor Corporation, et al.
as 3:2023cv00470
Petitioner: JIMMIE D WILSON and Jimmie D. Wilson
Respondent: Fluor Corporation, Insurance Company of The State of Pennsylvania and Director Office of Workers' Compensation Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Vectrus Systems Corporation et al v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor et al
as 3:2023cv00200
Petitioner: Vectrus Systems Corporation and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
Respondent: Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Talisha Rose
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 0901 Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act
OSO Sweet Farms, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff: OSO Sweet Farms, LLC
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation and Risk Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Health Freedom Defense Fund, et al v. President of the United States, et al
as 22-11287
Plaintiff / Appellee: HEALTH FREEDOM DEFENSE FUND, A Wyoming Not-for-Profit Corporation, ANA CAROLINA DAZA, An individual and SARAH POPE, An individual
Defendant / Appellant: PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL and others
Not Classified By Court: AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION and PUBLIC HEALTH AND PUBLIC HEALTH LAW EXPERTS
Governor's Inc et al v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00295
Plaintiff: Governor's Inc a corporation doing business as Conoco Food Mart and Fahd Saleh Hamied
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Okeelanta Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
as 9:2021cv81505
Plaintiff: Okeelanta Corporation
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
United States Sugar Corporation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 9:2021cv81506
Plaintiff: United States Sugar Corporation
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, Christine E. Wormuth, Jaime A. Pinkham and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?