Contract Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Branch Banking & Trust v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-13914
Plaintiff / Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant / Appellant: S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation, BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually and DONALD K. STEPHENS, individually
Greenberg v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv02071
Plaintiff: Joanne Greenberg and Starkey Road, Inc.
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank NA and Colonial Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. S&S Development, Inc., et al
as 14-12880
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant: S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida Corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN
Branch Banking and Trust Co. v. S&S Development, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-12879
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor-in-interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank, successor by merger to Citrus and Chemical Bank
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD K. STEPHENS, S&S DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Florida corporation and BRIAN K. SWAIN, individually
Charles Schwab & Company, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00578
Plaintiff: Charles Schwab & Company, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank, Jack C. Brandon , James C. Franklin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Crystal Garrett
as 12-12780
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, successor in interest to Colonial Bank, by asset acquisition from FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: CRYSTAL GARRETT
Branch Banking and Trust Compa v. Lawrence Maxwell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-12551
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation, as successor in interest to Colonial Bank by asset acquisition from the FDIC as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Defendant - Appellant: LAWRENCE T. MAXWELL
Colonial BancGroup, Inc. v. Branch Banking and Trust Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00824
Plaintiff: Colonial BancGroup, Inc.
Defendant: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Thirdparty_defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver for Colonial Bank
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Branch Banking and Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. et al v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP et al(LEAD CASE) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00746
Defendant: Crowe Horwath, LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Plaintiff: The Colonial BancGroup, Inc. and Kevin O'Halloran
Consolidated Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Colonial Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Colonial Bank et al v. Federal Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00610
Plaintiff: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Colonial Bank and The Colonial BancGroup, Inc.
Defendant: Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?