Cases 1 - 10 of 11
BLASZCZYK v. DARBY et al
as 0:2021cv60188
Defendant:
CRUISIN TIKI BUILDERS, LLC,, CRUISIN' TIKIS, LLC, CRUISIN TIKIS TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS W. BLASZCZYK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Darby Hall, Inc. v. James River Insurance Company
as 0:2020cv61792
Plaintiff:
Darby Hall, Inc.
Defendant:
James River Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darby v. Pilot Corporation et al
as 8:2016cv00525
Plaintiff:
Nolan C. Darby
Defendant:
Pilot Corporation and Pilot Travel Centers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
3126 Piedmont, LLC v. Darby
as 1:2014cv02297
Plaintiff:
3126 Piedmont, LLC
Defendant:
Danny Darby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Max Insurance Comp v. Robert Boland
as 13-10591
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE MAX INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT DARBY BOLAND
:
SERVICE
Progressive Max Insurance Company v. Clarke et al
as 1:2012cv00041
Plaintiff:
Progressive Max Insurance Company
Defendant:
Amanda E. Clarke, Robert Darby Boland and Thomas A. Dapogny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv22877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
United States of America v. Darby
as 1:2008cv00566
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Antonio Darby
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
R. G. Darby Company, Inc. v. SRC Construction, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00183
Plaintiff:
R. G. Darby Company, Inc.
Defendant:
SRC Construction, Inc., SRC Construction, Inc., Moody Family Housing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
R. G. Darby Company, Inc. v. SRC Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01807
Plaintiff:
R. G. Darby Company, Inc.
Defendant:
SRC Construction, Inc., Moody Family Housing, LLC, Moody Family Housing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
