Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Republic Bank of Chicago v Gehrisch Insurance & Financial Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00415
Defendant:
GEHRISCH INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES INC, MITCHELL ARDEN GEHRISCH and GEHRISCH INSURANCE & FINANCIAL SERVICES INC.
Plaintiff:
REPUBLIC BANK OF CHICAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pinnacle Insurance & Financial Services, LLC v. Sehnoutka et al
as 3:2016cv00546
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Insurance & Financial Services, LLC
Defendant:
Norman R. Sehnoutka, Jr. and Deborah Hersey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana et al
as 1:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
Larry Marshall
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and First Choice Insurance & Financial Services, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana and First Choice Insurance & Financial Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Larry Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kingdom Insurance Group LLC et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 7:2010cv00079
Defendant:
James Bletzer, Howard Jefferson, Richard Frommeyer and others
Plaintiff:
KINGDOM BENEFITS ASSOCIATION LLC, Kingdom Business Services LLC, KINGDOM INSURANCE GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kingdom Insurance Group LLC et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 7:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kingdom Insurance Group LLC, Kingdom Insurance Group LLC, Kingdom Insurance Group LLC and others
Defendant:
United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Healthcare Insurance Company, Protectors Insurance & Financial Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Fed USA Franchising,Inc. v. Turner et al
as 1:2008cv22505
Plaintiff:
Fed USA Franchising,Inc. and Fed USA Franchising,Inc.
Defendant:
John Turner, Elizabeth Turner and Academy Insurance & Financial Services,Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
